7 Intervention Gateways
How to stop a data center? Know where to fight.
The Seven Gateway Framework to stop bad data centers.
Please log in to comment on specific posts. To stay in the loop on data center policy, join Halt the Harm Network. This gives you access to the free leader network, plus a bi-weekly working sessions rotating through each of the seven frameworks explored on this site.
7 Points of Intervention
- Site Selection
- Power & Utility
- Water and Env. Impacts
- Tax Negotiations
- Financing and credit approvals
- Constructions
- Watchdog Community Monitoring
These seven critical intervention points represent hundreds of hours of collective learning from communities that have already fought these battles.
Open each page to read about the Gateway Strategy, stakeholders, allies, and to view a researched campaign playbook for ideas. See the resources (documents, articles, media) that relate to this specific step in data center development.
Tamara Saltman
Working Sessions Facilitator
Join the Conversation
Join the next Gateway Working Session in Halt the Harm Network to learn and contribute network knowledge. hosted by Tamara Saltman.
-
Gateway 1: Site Selection & Land Acquisition
Early organizing during land assembly can raise costs and create uncertainty that halts projects before they’re announced.
Key Leverage Points
Proactive zoning, landowner education, public records monitoring
Track Record
Multiple projects stopped before announcement
-
Gateway 2: Power & Utility Interconnection
Utility approval processes offer opportunities to expose true costs and rate impacts. Technical interventions here have stopped multiple projects.
Key Leverage Points
Grid impact studies, rate increase exposure, PUC interventions
Track Record
Projects stopped through utility commission challenges
-
Gateway 3: Water Resources and Utilities
Environmental review requirements create formal comment periods where scientific evidence and community concerns must be addressed.
Key Leverage Points
Water usage studies, PFAS concerns, environmental impact statements
Track Record
Permits denied or heavily conditioned
-
Gateway 4: Tax Incentive Negotiations
Public hearings on tax breaks offer high-visibility moments where economic analysis and organized opposition change votes.
Key Leverage Points
Fiscal impact challenges, job creation myths, public hearing turnout
Track Record
Tax packages reduced or denied
-
Gateway 5: Financial Structuring & Credit Approvals
Documented community opposition affects project financing. Credit rating agencies and banks increasingly factor in ‘social license’ risk.
Key Leverage Points
ESG campaigns, investor pressure, social license documentation
Track Record
Projects delayed or restructured due to financing concerns
-
Gateway 6: Construction & Operational Permits
Even approved projects need multiple permits. Each permit process offers leverage for conditions or delays that can reshape or stop projects.
Key Leverage Points
Permit monitoring, violation enforcement, community monitoring
Track Record
Projects reshaped through permit conditions
-
Gateway 7: Operational Oversight & Watchdogging
Operational projects need to be monitored for pollution, violations, and ongoing harassment and threats to the community.
Key Leverage Points
Independent noise/air monitoring, subsidy compliance audits, FOIA/public records requests, expansion “scope creep” tracking.
Track Record
Subsidies clawed back for missed job targets; facilities forced into sound-mitigation retrofits due to community-documented violations.