Key Targets (Gatekeepers)
- Building inspectors and code officials: Local officials enforcing construction codes and standards
- Air quality permit officers: Regulators review site emissions and assess the impacts on local and regional air pollution
- Water and stormwater management officials: Agencies managing runoff, erosion, and water quality
- Fire marshals and emergency planners: Officials responsible for fire safety and emergency response
- Occupational safety inspectors: OSHA and state safety officials monitoring workplace conditions
Possible Interventions
- Monitor All Permit Applications: Track every building, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and specialized permit application to identify intervention opportunities. Check the legal notices in your local paper and town websites and request a public hearing.
- Challenge Inadequate Plans: File technical critiques of construction plans showing insufficient noise control, emissions management, or safety measures
- Demand Enforceable Conditions: Advocate for specific, measurable permit conditions with clear and preferably automatic enforcement mechanisms and penalties
- File Complaints on Violations: Document and report all permit violations, safety issues, noise exceedances, and environmental infractions
- Continuous Community Monitoring: Establish resident-led monitoring programs for noise, air quality, traffic, water pressure, water discharge quality, and other impacts and share your results with authorities and the community
Gateway Intervention
Campaign Playbook
Each campaign will have its own unique challenges and context. We are here to help talk through steps. The steps in this guide are informed by community victories so we aren’t reinventing the wheel. Contact us to talk about your campaign.
1. Monitor Permit Notices and Gather information:
Establish permit application tracking system. Create a network of community members to monitor and track permit applications across different agencies, boards, and commissions. Identify all relevant permitting authorities and processes. Engage technical experts for plan review. Check with historical societies for sites, buildings and burial grounds that should be protected and preserved and identify protected waters and species and who uses nearby land and water for hunting, fishing, farming, and gathering. Get info on height restrictions, noise ordinances, light ordinances, set back requirements from schools, homes, hospitals, and recreational areas.
2. Active Intervention:
Look for notices about permits and public hearings in local newspapers, on agency and municipal websites, and buried in Board meeting agendas. Review and comment on all permit applications. Attend permit hearings and inspections when possible. File formal objections with the permitting authority to inadequate conditions that don’t address community concerns or likely impacts. Push for company funded baseline monitoring before operations begin so there is a clear record of existing conditions and future impacts can be identified. If that isn’t possible, consider community-led baseline monitoring. Partner with local schools or advocacy organizations with monitoring experience. Advocate for enhanced monitoring where existing regulatory requirements may not capture likely impacts, and require that monitoring data and results be readily available for public review. Use drones, piloted flights, web cameras, traffic counts, noise monitors, air monitoring, water monitoring to keep eyes on the site and gather data you can share with regulators and the public.
3. Enforcement & Compliance:
Design and implement a community-run science monitoring program to capture photos, videos, noise levels, traffic, air pollution, water pollution, and any other site-specific impacts of concern. Document anything that might be a problem and work with partners (e.g. environmental organizations, a retired expert, a friendly employee) to get a second opinion or gather supporting data. Use hotlines and email inboxes published by state and local agencies to report suspected violations promptly. Most states have separate numbers or emails to report algae blooms, oil spills, explosions, bad smells, visible air pollution, stormwater run-off, lack of run-off berms, smelly or oddly-colored pipe discharges into waterbodies, and other common site problems. Municipalities may have phone numbers where you can leave messages reporting problems with active construction sites. Request inspections and enforcement actions from agency staff and loop in elected leaders to back you up. Build relationships with people and enforcement agencies who will learn to trust your data.
Valuable Allies
You don’t need to take on bad data centers alone. There are organizations and experts who can help. Explore the Network to find other leaders, and discover organizations in the Alliance Map.
Code Compliance Experts: Search permits and board meeting materials for construction plans, and file freedom of information act (or your local equivalent) requests to get copies if they are not publicly available. Find people in your community (e.g. retired experts, local college or university professors or graduate students, grassroots support organizations) who know how to find and review publicly-available construction plans and identify deficiencies. Ask them to explain what they find to your group and suggest improvements that you can demand.
Environmental Monitoring Experts in Health Departments and Environmental Agencies: Conduct air, water, and noise monitoring; use cameras or drones to capture video and still images; install a traffic counter or access live traffic feeds; help you interpret and understand your monitoring data
Local Colleges, Universities, and Schools: Can help you set up monitoring sites, collect and analyze samples, and review data; may also get involved in advocacy through public hearings and submitting written comments
Community Organizers and Volunteers: Coordinate community science monitoring networks and partner with garden clubs, historical societies, hunting and fishing groups, PTAs, student groups, community service organizations, land trusts and land preservation groups, and other environmental and resource advocacy groups
Public Health Advocates: Document community health risks by recording impacts and identifying what health risks might be associated with them. Request follow-up monitoring of key health risks and collect available community-level data for deeper assessments. Encourage concerned community members to ask their doctors for screenings or other appropriate testing.
Environmental Attorneys: File enforcement complaints and appeals
Gateway 6: Construction & Operational Permits
Resources & Documents
Essential tools and resource for this gateway.
Add A ResourceData Crunch: How the AI Boom Threatens to Entrench Fossil Fuels and Compromise Climate Goals (opens in a new tab)
Released by the Center for Biological Diversity, Data Crunch quantifies the GHG emissions of the projected AI data center buildout in the U.S. A massive expansion of data centers, set to be powered pr…
- Source
- Center for Biological Diversity
- Published
- October 1, 2025
Lessons Learned for Data Center Regulation: A Conversation with Minnesota Advocates (opens in a new tab)
Growing demand for data centers poses threats to energy affordability, grid reliability, and environmental quality. Minnesota has enacted HF 16 to regulate these impacts, eliminating tax exemptions an…
- Source
- Climate X Change
- Published
- January 29, 2026
NAACP Stop Dirty Data How to Negotiate on CBAs and CAB template – Final.pdf (opens in a new tab)
This document is a negotiation guide and template for communities facing proposed data centers. Covers forming a Community Advisory Board, securing cost-recovery agreements for legal and technical sup…
- Source
- NAACP
Saline Township Legal Data Center Consent Judgment (opens in a new tab)
This consent judgment is a formal legal resolution that determines how a data center project can proceed within Saline Township after a dispute, most likely over zoning or land use. It establishes bin…
- Source
- State of Michigan
AI companies are building huge natural gas plants to power data centers. What could go wrong? (opens in a new tab)
- Source
- TechCrunch
- Published
- April 3, 2026
Mapped: U.S. States Moving to Restrict Data Centers (opens in a new tab)
- Source
- Visual Capitalist
- Published
- April 7, 2026
Cumulative Impacts (Tishman Environment and Design Center) (opens in a new tab)
A State Cumulative Impacts Permitting Policies 2.0 Database tracks bills, laws, and mapping tools shaping how states weigh compounded environmental and health burdens in permitting decisions, updated…
- Source
- Tishman Environment and Design Center, The New School
Entergy to Build Three Gas Plants for Meta’s Biggest Data Center (opens in a new tab)
- Source
- EnergyNow.com
- Published
- August 22, 2025
Controversial Oldham County Data Center Project Dropped After Backlash (opens in a new tab)
- Source
- WDRB
- Published
- July 3, 2025
Google Data Centers in Chesterfield, Virginia (opens in a new tab)
Google Data Centers in Chesterfield, Virginia tracks three proposed Google data center campuses—Peanut, Skye, and Loch—and brings together information on their locations, land purchases, water use…
- Published
- December 1, 2025
Ask a Scientist: A Data Center Was Proposed in My Town. Now What? – Union of Concerned Sc… (opens in a new tab)
When a data center is proposed, communities have multiple opportunities to get involved—from local permitting and public utility commission proceedings to demanding transparency about energy, water,…
- Source
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- Published
- March 12, 2026
New Data Center Construction: Invited or Feared? | Data Center Frontier (opens in a new tab)
This Data Center Frontier article compares two reports with conflicting findings on community attitudes toward data center construction: an Airedale/Modine survey showing 70% of Americans are comforta…
- Source
- Data Center Frontier
