Key Targets (Gatekeepers)
- Utility company executives and boards: Decision-makers on interconnection approvals and grid upgrades
- Public Utility Commission officials: State regulators overseeing utility decisions and rate impacts
- Independent System Operators (ISOs/RTOs): Regional grid coordinators managing interconnection queues
- State energy regulators: Policy-makers setting grid planning and cost allocation rules
- Grid engineers and technical experts: Professionals conducting load studies and impact assessments
Possible Interventions
- Challenge Grid Impact Studies: File technical critiques of developer load studies showing inadequate analysis of cascading impacts on grid stability
- Expose Rate Increase Projections: Commission independent analysis of ratepayer cost impacts and demand public hearings on cost allocation
- Demand Community Cost Hearings: Require utility to hold public hearings on who pays for grid upgrades and ratepayer impacts
- Technical Review of Agreements: Engage grid engineers to identify flaws in interconnection agreements and grid upgrade plans
- Ratepayer Coalition Building: Unite consumer advocates, fixed-income residents, and businesses around shared grid cost concerns
Gateway Intervention
Campaign Playbook
Each campaign will have it’s own unique challenges and context. We are here to help talk through steps. The steps in this guide are informed by community victories so we aren’t reinventing the wheel. Contact us to talk about your campaign.
1. Learn how to identify and intervene in case(s) about the project
Subscribe to notices on filings made at the PUC to identify when a related case has begun. Identify the process to become a party (“intervene”) and determine whether to join a case depending on priorities and resources or to pursue other types of engagement. Follow which other people or groups intervene or participate, find out what their objectives are, and reach out to those who may be aligned.
2. Define critical issues and/or “red lines” to guide advocacy efforts
What are the most important aspects of the project for you? Is it electricity rates? Environmental pollution/justice? Carbon footprint? Amount and type of community benefits? Are there terms that would allow you to support, or at least not object, to the project? Will you demand a specific mix of generation to power the facility? Are you a no under all circumstances? Be clear on how you want to influence the outcomes and what things you will not accept.
3. Coordinate across other aspects of the campaign (i.e. other Gateways, public pressure efforts, legislative advocacy, etc.)
Communication across the various aspects of campaigns is important to ensure you’re working together and not unintentionally at odds with each other. Though PUC proceedings tend to be legal and technical and less visible, coordinated pressure can be applied across other branches of government (Governor’s office and legislature), on related things happening at the local or federal level, and through media strategy to increase public engagement.
Valuable Allies
You don’t need to take on bad data centers alone. There are organizations and experts who can help. Explore the directory to find other leaders, and discover organizations in the Alliance Map.
Utility Law Attorneys: Navigate PUC procedures and file formal interventions
Grid Engineers: Provide credible technical critiques of load studies
Consumer Advocates: Champion ratepayer interests in cost allocation
Energy Economists: Quantify rate impacts and alternative cost scenarios
Environmental Justice Groups: Highlight disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities
Gateway 2: Power & Utility Interconnection
Resources & Documents
Essential tools and resource for this gateway.
Add A ResourceBig Tech’s Affordability Fight is Finally Here | TechPolicy.Press (opens in a new tab)
Big Tech faces scrutiny over the economic costs of data centers, as rising utility bills and tax breaks impact consumers and state budgets. With a growing public backlash, tech companies are pledging…
- Source
- TechPolicy.press
- Published
- March 4, 2026
Fission for Algorithms: The Undermining of Nuclear Regulation in Service of AI – AI Now Insti… (opens in a new tab)
AI companies seek five to 50 gigawatts of nuclear power for data centers, driving three fast-tracking paths: weakening radiation safety standards like LNT and ALARA, using large language models to gen…
- Source
- AI Now Institute
- Published
- November 14, 2025
Senators Demand to Know How Much Energy Data Centers Use | WIRED (opens in a new tab)
No federal agency collects energy-use data from data centers. Senators Warren and Hawley press the EIA to require comprehensive annual disclosures for grid planning and ratepayer protection.
- Source
- Wired
- Published
- March 26, 2026
Data Center Energy Demand Should be Contested (opens in a new tab)
Data center power demand distorts energy markets and strains grids. Climate & Community Institute calls for democratic grid planning and moratoriums over accommodating Big Tech's load growth.
- Source
- Climate & Community Institute
- Published
- March 19, 2026
Amp Up the People: A Practical Guide for Energy Justice Advocates in Utility Regulation (opens in a new tab)
The Initiative for Energy Justice and Vote Solar co-created this guide for frontline communities navigating utility regulation. Covers Integrated Resource Plans, rate cases, Public Utility Commission…
- Source
- Initiative for Energy Justice
- Published
- September 9, 2024
Utilities for All: The People’s Playbook to Ending Debt & Shutoffs (opens in a new tab)
This playbook synthesizes lessons from 16 organizers and activists fighting for affordable, reliable energy and water. Covers tactics for banning utility shutoffs, eliminating consumer debt and buildi…
- Source
- Energy Democracy Project
- Published
- June 2, 2025
Environmental Burden of United States Data Centers in the Artificial Intelligence Era (opens in a new tab)
US data centers produce 105 million tons of CO2e per year, with a carbon intensity 48 percent higher than the national average. A Harvard analysis of 2,132 facilities across 52 grid regions shows 56 p…
- Source
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
- Published
- November 1, 2024
Virginia Data Centers Face Seven-Year Wait for Power Hookups, Dominion Says (opens in a new tab)
Dominion Energy projects a seven-year wait for large data centers seeking grid connections in Virginia, up from four years. The extended timeline targets facilities drawing more than 100 megawatts and…
- Source
- Bloomberg
- Published
- August 29, 2024
Vampire Planet: Data Centers, Far Bigger Disasters Than You Even Thought (opens in a new tab)
Data Centers Impact on Energy Demand (opens in a new tab)
A 2025 NAACP resolution addressing data centers' impact on energy demand, water resources, and frontline communities. The resolution calls for community benefits agreements, congressional legisla…
- Source
- NAACP
Interconnection – Oregon Community Solar Program (opens in a new tab)
Portland General Electric, Pacific Power and Idaho Power each run dedicated interconnection queues for community solar projects under Oregon's state rules (OAR 860-082). Covers Tier 2 and Tier 4…
- Source
- Oregon Community Solar Program
- Published
- November 18, 2020
Nationwide Tracker for Utility Interconnection Requests (opens in a new tab)
Track interconnection queue requests across U.S. and North American ISOs and utilities. Learn what types of projects are being proposed, where, and how long they take to get approved. The dataset come…
- Source
- Interconnection.fyi
